Batteries are no longer a simple commodity. Â Among other safety features, they include a microprocessor to assure safe recharging. Â There is no assurance that a third-party battery has been designed with safety in mind.
 The decision should be left to the customers with a warning message as is the standard practice.
Trying to actively block their usage is something nasty. At least, there should be a clear communication in this regard. But there is a reason such things are not clearly communicated.
There are several reputed companies and many do offer innovative alternatives.
Even the power adapter is blocked citing similar frivolous reasons. Not including it here, since there is already a suggestion made about it.
I don't think that in UE jurisdiction it is legal to block someone else solutions?! I do not see battery as patentable solution? (battery technology yes - as cell chemical/tech. specification). Dell do not produce cells, Dell also do not produce it's batteries - Foxcon does. Same way it would be for Power Supply and laptop bag or DVD drive ... it is like to patent a wheel with FORD logo and only allow to use Ford wheels in Ford cars? Does sound ridiculous ? It is ... user can decide whether he wants battery replacement from other company... It seems that Dell is trying to go Apple way .... that would be not niceÂ
Trying to actively block their usage is something nasty. At least, there should be a clear communication in this regard. But there is a reason such things are not clearly communicated.
There are several reputed companies and many do offer innovative alternatives.
Even the power adapter is blocked citing similar frivolous reasons. Not including it here, since there is already a suggestion made about it.
http://www.ideastorm.com/ideaView?id=087700000000c8GAAQ