Vostro and resolution - a question of balance

April 4, 2011

9 Votes

Status: Archived

Promote

I have been following the Vostro line for a while and with the new introductions of the 3450-3550-3750, I continue to be disappointed at how the screen resolutions are not as optimal.

What we have are this:

V3300:   1366 x 768
V3450:   1366 x 768
V3550:   1366 x 768
V3750:   1600 x 900

One of the problem with the 16:9 screen ratio is we lose vertical screen size for the benefit of getting 16:9 HD movie formet.  The majority of people getting a laptop is not buying it to watch movie, we do work on word processor and spreadsheet or if we get to multi-media, we do work on pictures thru Phtoshop, etc.  With a 16:9 screen, we actually are losing working screen estate with the squished height.

I dont have a problem with the 16:9 screen format itself but with only 1366 x 768 resolution, I am getting less practical working space then the old 1280 x 800.  With most documents I work with in portrait format or with pictures I work in Photoshop (that are in the normal 3:2 ratio), I am actually getting a smaller working area with more waste space on the wider 16:9 screen.  

I feel the V3300 with 1366 x 768 on the 13.3" screen is fine.  I have the V3300 but still ove my XPS M1330 with 1280 x 800 more.

The V3450 and V3550 largers 14" and 15.6" screens with only 1366 x 768 can be much better with 1600 x 900.  The V3500 has 1920 x 1080 but that is too much and would be more appropriate for the V3750.

My recommendations to Dell are to have the following:

Vostro 33xx:    1366 x 768  and  1600 x 900 (as an option)
Vostro 34xx:    1366 x 768  and  1600 x 900 (as an option)
Vostro 35xx:    1366 x 768  and  1600 x 900  and 1920 x 1080 (as options)
Vostro 37xx:    1600 x 900  and 1920 x 1080 (as options)

I know Lenovo T420's compete with the Vostro 34xx and has screen options and T520's (similar to V35xx) has those options.

I hope this helps.  Thank you.

9 Votes | 5 Comments | Report Abuse

Please login to IdeaStorm to post a comment.

    Comments :
     
  • Jun 15, 2011     Comment Link

    Report Abuse

    -1 because this is a wish to raise up Pixels Per Inch
    altought this is a GOOD comment place

    All we use eyes to interpret the laptops screen,
    PPI raising is bad for humans.
    Text is hardly readable, because the common softwares
    draw too small fonts
    (TRUE TYPE -> 10 or less pixel height  BITMAP!)

    "Standard" displays range from 57 to 135 PPI.
    (640x480@14" to 1366x768@11.6")
    I prefer 768 or max. 800 pixel height for portable displays.
    I prefer approx. 100 PPI for portable displays.

    I prefer 900 or max. 1024 pixel  height for desktop displays.
    I prefer approx. 75 PPI for desktop displays. (not manufactured currently)

    The VERTICAL space LOSS is a very big problem for me.
    The HD aspect ratio ( 1.777778) is a marketing viewpoint!
    Because of this I prefer the "golden ratio" 16:10=8:5
    OR SMALLER aspect ratios.

    1.25 (1280x1024; for work with desktop computer :-)
    1.333334 (800x600, 1024x768, 1152x864, 1280x960)
    1.5 (1152x768)
    1.6 (1280x800, 1440x900;  The *hinkPad why use 1.6?)
    1.666667 (1280x768 WXGA)
    1.706667 (1024x600  netbook)
    1.751282 (1366x780 DELL XPS 15)
    1.770833 (1360x768 DELL Inspiron N5010 15.6")
    1.777778 (1280x720, 1920x1080; good for movie watching)
    1.85 !
    2.4 !!
    2.76 !!!

    900 is the special pixel height :-)
    1125x900, 1200x900, 1350x900, 1440x900, 1500x900, 1536x900, 1600x900

    A nice PPI calculator:
    http://members.ping.de/~sven/dpi.html

    I suppose to read the PPI (pixels per inch) pages of the wikipedia:
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pixel_density
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_displays_by_pixel_density
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Display_resolution
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Computer_display_standard
    http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/VESA

  •  
  • Apr 10, 2011     Comment Link

    Report Abuse

    Or better yet:

    12.1"/13.3" models: 1280x800
    14.1" models: 1280x800, 1440x900
    15.4" models: 1280x800, 1680x1050
    17" models: 1440x900, 1920x1200

    So, I only partially agree with the original idea.
  •  
  • Apr 10, 2011     Comment Link

    Report Abuse

    How is possible that Vostro got better graphics than the higher class Latitude E6x20?
  •  
  • Apr 10, 2011     Comment Link

    Report Abuse

    6630M with Core I3 sounds an ideal gaming laptop.
  •  
  • Apr 10, 2011     Comment Link

    Report Abuse

    Agree with screen resolution and please make available AMD Radeon™ HD 6630M with Core I3 CPU as well. I do not want buy Core I5 for extra hundred dollars just because you do not offer 6630M with I3.