I guess I've had my Dell XPS M1730 for like six years now, with arguments whenever it's gone wrong that "Dell laptops have never had blu-ray drives" in them, which is odd considering I was sold with one! With the most reccent Alienware laptops not possessing them, I think it's high time such systems did, in order to compete with rival manufacturers HP, MSI, Lenovo, Acer and Toshiba. Since I don't know where you get your units of optical drives from, Digistor lists Panasonic (one with bundled software) and TEAC slot-load offerings that write single-layer, double-layer, triple-layer and quad-layer BDRs, as well as a host of other formats.People want systems that write optical media as well as read them, instead of carting around an external drive. Please make this a reality.
My idea is based around the need for Small and Medium sized enterprises to have a new form factor created around their very specific need to get datacenter capable components that cannot be situated in a dedicated datacenter. Their needs are getting ever more sophisticated but its hard for them to have multiple tower servers or one powerful server situated in an office environment. If they did go for rack servers a large rack dominates the office space and of course remains loud due to the BPU output. I am therefore proposing a new standard be created around the traditional rack platform but meets specific criteria for SME; 1. Size (Office Space) 2. Power (Efficiency) 3. Cooling (Reduced active cooling) My idea is around taking the traditional server rack 'U' format and shrinking it to a more suitable standard for SME's. i.e. 'Mini U'. It could be around 50-70% of the normal depth and width and a maximum of perhaps 50% of the height. This rack could then take mini U servers, storage, switches, routers, UPS's, patch cabling etc. It would likely need to be an open standard in order for other vendors to build equipment to the new standard or offer rack mount kits for their existing equipment. With Mini ITX and ATX becoming more commonplace and Intel driving down the TDP of their processors we must surely be in a situation where these servers could be produced effectively. Think along the lines of a blade computer but one that is stand alone and mountable. These racks could also be used for Enterprises for satellite offices too. When working for a Microsoft Gold Partner we were frequently told by Microsoft that theres a lot of consultancies going for the large corporates and yet there are literally hundreds of thousands of SME's in the marketplace desperate for more IT maturity. Obviously cost is always going to be a factor but the volume might become comparable to large enterprises when taking into account the number of businesses out there. With Microsoft's essentials platforms you could pretty much have an OEM appliance marketplace developed as well as Open source opportunities. I know for me as an SME consultant I would love to have equipment like this available that allows me to help a small business but allow them the headroom for years to come. Especially because VMWare offer ESX SME solutions too. Its an idea I have been thinking about for a couple of years so happy for it to be dissected, good or bad, pros and cons. Richard Status Update: This idea has been Partially Implemented with the announcement of the Dell PowerEdge VRTX converged solution. Thank you for posting!
Following Dell's acqusition of Compellent, it appears that a decision was made to remove the Compellent logo from the front of each drive carrier. I discovered this after purchasing (and recieving just yesterday) a new shelf of 15K SAS disks for my Compellent SAN. Here's the new shelf as installed (the new shelf is on the bottom).As you can see, not only do the new drives not match the rest of the system, but also (and perhaps more importantly) the Compellent branding is significantly decreased, making the array look like a generic no-name disk array. Yes, the Dell|Compellent logo is present on the right-side bezel, but that's a miniscule amount of real-estate compared to having a logo on each drive carrier.Please consider bringing back the Compellent logo on these drive carriers.Thank you![Personal information redacted]
In every enterprise there is a need for a lightweight server, running a domain server, email server, webserver for intranet, etc These servers don't need much processing capability, but as they run all the time need to be energy efficient and not take up too much room. Of course a lot of these are virtualised now, but this doesn't suit everyone. My idea is to create a new server platform which is basically an android based mobile phone without the phone connectivity and to either rely on wifi, or add a network connection. For disk based tasks add an SSD drive which would be fast and also low heat/energy. Android can easily run domain server, email server, etc software The OS can also be locked down to prevent virus attacks, and because it can be treated as a true appliance the maintenance for the device would be very low (no running large numbers of windows updates etc) Because of it's size, you could fit a very large number of this appliance servers in a rack mounting kit. In terms of creating these devices, a lot of the software and hardware already exists already. Please let me know what you think of this idea.
The newest PERC H700 and H800 RAID Controllers have this new "feature" that should be removed in the next firmware release: "Blocking of non Dell certified drives being used with PERC H700 or PERC H800" That quote was taken directly from perc-technical-guidebook.pdf Dell has confirmed that those controllers will prevent an off-the-shelf SAS or SATA drive from being used. Right now there is no way around this besides purchasing a different controller. There is NO indication of this "feature" when purchasing the system. Dell claims that they do this becasue their drive firmware is superior and that they will be selling them for at least 10 years. What do I do after 10 years? What if I need a replacement NOW and can't wait a few days? What if I don't want to pay Dell's 250% markup on drives when I can get the same drive from the same manufacturer from newegg.com for less than half the price? I (and many people on the linux-poweredge mailing list) propose this solution: The controller or OMSA should remind the user that the non-Dell drive is not supported by Dell and require the user to acknowledge this before the drive can be used. That way Dell can cover their behind and the user has the freedom they expect from Dell. The current approach of blocking the drive can only be described as greedy. Especially because Dell does not make an effort to inform people before the purchase the hardware. Status Update: Please see Dennis_s' comment for further details. Thanks for posting!
Categories: Servers and Storage,
I was really looking forward to getting a Vostro over an Inspiron thanks to its durability, reduced bloatware and Vista Ultimate options but I cannot understand why Dell doesn't include a 7200RPM option. I'd be willing to put up with a delay if the option were made available but why isn't it an option? The HDD is the only thing stopping me and possibly others from making the jump to Vostro as speed is of great importance. I hope this is taken care of soon as the Vostro is otherwise a very slick machine. Status Update A 7200 RPM hard drive is an option on the new Vostro1510.
As notebook mobility is becoming more and more important, battery autonomy and NOT available disk space is becoming a major decisive factor.It would thus be very useful to be able to build a notebook without the standard power guzzling hard drive.A Solid State Device HD would lower heat generation and lower power consumption. Status UpdateGreat idea! We are already offering SSDs on some of our products. http://direct2dell.com/one2one/archive/2007/06/26/19139.aspx
This amazing supercomputer that apparently went in to operation 3 days ago is a Dell. Yet looking for info on Dell's web site it's so hard to find (I couldn't find it) that feels like they're embarrassed of it. Did Dell just overlook a great marketing opportunity? Or does Dell have some other reason not to make as hard to find on their web site as other Dell products running the same family of operating systems? http://www.tgdaily.com/content/view/32716/113/ NCSA: A look inside one of the world's most capable supercomputer facilities ... Abe is the latest supercomputer to join NCSA. It is scheduled to go into full production on Monday, July 2, 2007. It's currently operating at full capacity and is rated #8 in the world. It operates at a maximum computing capacity of just under 90 teraflops. Its sustained computing capacity is documented at around 63 teraflops. It is a Linux-based cluster comprised of 1200 Dell PowerEdge 1955s blades. Each blade sports two 2.33 GHz Quad-Core Xeons (Clovertown core) on a 1333 GHz FSB operating in Intel64 mode (true 64-bit computing). That's 2400 physical processors housing 9600 cores. The system communicates with itself and the outside world using an Infiniband network at 10 Gbps. It has 200 TB of disk storage and each core has a dedicated GB of memory all to itself, resulting 9.6 TB of DDR2 memory total. ... #90 - â€œTungstenâ€� - 2003 â€“ 16.4 teraflops debuted at #3 in the world...is a Red Hat Linux-based cluster comprised of 1750 Dell PowerEdge 1750 Yet when I go to Dell.com and look for more info: http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=gen&c=us&l=en&cs=&k=abe&cat=prod some stuff on Abe Milstein, but nothing on this impressive Dell computer. http://search.dell.com/results.aspx?s=gen&c=us&l=en&cs=&k=supercomputer&cat=ans I see a bunch of old news about 2005 and 2002 computers; but if the newest, most impressive ones are in there, you don't make it easy to find. Ideas: Put a block describing this stunningly impressive Abe computer in your (small and large) business and government Server pages like this one: http://www.dell.com/content/products/category.aspx/enterprise?c=us&cs=04&l=en... Put a block describing this stunningly impressive Abe computer in the rotation on the big spot on your home page. Yes, I know not many customers will buy that exact same computer; but they might want to buy a scaled down version. And it'll let them know that Dell can grow with them however big there needs are; while I suspect most people's first impression is that Dell is more the small windows-file-server vendor rather than serious computers. Make a whitepaper that describes in detail the hardware & software used to make a computer like this one. in case you do have customers that want to build a scaled down version of this. Or can't you let people know that you made one of the most impressive computers in the world because it runs Linux - so you bury it in hidden parts of the web site like your Ubuntu products? Status Update Dell has had a longstanding relationship with NCSA and we're really proud of the work that's being done on Dell systems. To read more about Dell's high-performance computing clusters click here.
Been using an M70 for two years and was eager to see the Santa Rosa based workstation laptop. Looking for 15.4" as the 17" is too much to carry around and I have a Precision 390 for hardcore work (solid modeling, FEA, CFD) at the office. It would be nice to offer a Precision M4300 with more than just the entry Quadro 360M and an analog VGA port - how about the Quadro 1600M and a DVI. This would give a powerful workstation class notebook that can be carried around. Status Update Please see mano_g's comment
Dell change CD/DVD's on your Desktop and Server models (All) to SATA. Using SATA cables reduces any ventilation restrictions which can occur with IDE ribbon cables. SATA also reduces configuration issues for new computer users, reducing support calls. Start Jul 2nd: provided by florida web site design